In a landmark legal clash, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg took the witness stand to defend his tech empire against the U.S. Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) aggressive antitrust lawsuit. At the heart of the case: whether Meta’s billion-dollar acquisitions of Instagram (2012) and WhatsApp (2014) illegally crushed competition and cemented the company’s monopoly in social networking.
Facing pointed questions from government lawyers, Zuckerberg pushed back hard. “These deals were greenlit by regulators years ago,” he argued. “Now the FTC is trying to rewrite history.”
But this isn’t just about past deals. It’s a high-stakes fight over whether Meta has become too big to innovate—and too powerful to compete with.
What the FTC Wants—and Why It Matters
The FTC claims Meta strategically acquired emerging threats to eliminate competition. Instead of competing on merit, the agency alleges, Meta simply bought its way to dominance. According to internal company emails made public in court, Instagram was once seen as a “very disruptive” threat to Facebook’s hold on photo sharing. WhatsApp, with its skyrocketing user base and focus on privacy, posed a similar challenge.
Combined, Instagram and WhatsApp now have over 3 billion monthly active users. That’s more than one-third of the global population—consolidated under a single corporate roof.
If the FTC succeeds, it could force Meta to spin off both platforms—a dramatic and unprecedented rollback of digital consolidation in Silicon Valley.
Meta’s Counterpunch: “We Still Have Rivals”
Meta’s legal team argues the tech landscape has changed dramatically—and competition is alive and well. Platforms like TikTok (1.7 billion users), YouTube, Snapchat, and newer entrants fueled by generative AI continue to siphon attention, especially among Gen Z.
Zuckerberg emphasized that Meta’s innovations, including Reels and Threads, are direct responses to market pressure—not monopolistic muscle. “This is a dynamic and fast-moving industry,” he said. “We fight to stay relevant every day.”
Tech analysts agree that Meta’s user growth has slowed in the U.S. and Europe, with rising scrutiny over data privacy and AI content moderation. But its dominance in ad revenue—Meta pulled in over $116 billion in advertising in 2023 alone—remains a central concern for regulators.
Interesting Read
A Case That Could Redefine Silicon Valley
If the FTC wins, it could signal a turning point for how regulators deal with tech giants retroactively. No Big Tech breakup has succeeded in decades—but a ruling against Meta would pave the way for tighter controls on future mergers and possibly inspire similar suits against Amazon, Google, and Apple.
If Meta prevails, it could reinforce the legal shield protecting major tech mergers—and offer a roadmap for others to follow.
Either way, this courtroom drama is more than a legal battle. It’s a moment of reckoning for the entire tech industry—and all eyes are on Zuckerberg as he fights to keep Meta intact.
